PRODUCT SEARCH
NEWS SEARCH LINK | FAVOURITES | SITE MAP
> ABOUT US
> PRODUCTS
> NEWS&EVENTS
> DOCUMENTS
> SOLUTION
> CAREERS
> CONTACT US
Home >> NEWS&EVENTS >>
Propagation Over Soil of Antennas
Source: Author:  Published:1265712561
When we position antennas over soil and propagate the signal any significant distance, it will reflect from soil or water and produce a large multipath signal. Soil is a conductive dielectric that reflects horizontally and vertically polarized signals differently. Typical ground constants are listed in Table 1. Given the grazing angle  measured between the reflected ray and ground, the voltage reflection coefficients are
antenna  (1)
where .
Figure 1-9 gives the reflection coefficient for the two polarizations versus grazing angle. Horizontal polarization reflects from soil about the same as a metal surface. Vertical polarization reflection produces a more interesting curve. The graph shows that the reflection is low over a region of grazing angles. The minimum reflection direction is called the Brewster angle. At this angle the reflected wave is absorbed into the soil. At high grazing angles   has a phase near   and   a phase of   . When the grazing angle decreases and becomes less than the Brewster angle, the vertical polarization reflection changes from  to . Remember that for most general response nulls, the signal phase changes by 180◦ when passing through the transition. As the grazing angle approaches zero both reflection coefficients approach −1 and multipath is independent of polarization.
 
TABLE 1 Typical Ground Constants
 
antenna 
 
FIGURE 1 Average soil reflection for horizontal and vertical polarization.
The electric field at the receiving antenna height
is the sum of the direct wave plus the reflected wave, which traveled along a longer path:
antenna 
We compute the magnitude
 
for the small phase difference between the two equal-amplitude signals. The received power  is proportional to . The path loss for this multipath link is modified from the free-space equation:
antenna  (2)
 
Equation (2) states that the power received is proportional to   and increases by   for either antenna. We can approximate the propagation over soil by a region for closely spaced antennas when the results consist of the free-space transmission with    average transmission with significant variation due to multipath and a second region proportional to  with small multipath variations. The breakpoint between the two models occurs at a distance . Experiments at mobile telephone frequencies showed that Eq. (2) overestimates the received power when the receiving antenna height is less than 30m and a more correct model modifies the exponent of  [11, p. 38]:
  (3)
Below 10 m, C = 1 and the exponent varies linearly between 10 and 30 m: C =.
On a narrow-beam terrestrial propagation path, scattering from an object along a path an odd multiple of  produces a signal that reduces the main path signal. Given an obstacle at a distance h radial from the direct ray path and located  from the transmitter and a distance  from the receiving antenna, we determine the differential path length as
antenna  (4)
We call these Fresnel clearance zones of order n. The direct path should clear obstacles by at least one clearance zone distance h to prevent the scattered signal from having a negative impact on the communication link. The first Fresnel zone touches ground when antenna  is the breakpoint distance between  and  propagation models.
[Print] [Close]
COPYRIGHT BY ANTETEC TECHNOLOGIES LTD. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED IE5.5 OR ABOVE,1024*768